I am very for your emphasis on psychedelics to encourage people, but not the use of pharmaceutical psychiatric drugs. I am very against them as I will brielfy explain and then go more into the psychedelics: I think people should really educate themselves about the sham foundations the psychiatric/pharmaceutical industry rests on, namely the mental illness myth. by myth I in no way am saying people do not experience a multitude and diverse array of psychological problems and/or states this culture finds unacceptable. of course they do. But what the mental illness myth tries to pretend via their authority is that these states are 'biologically-caused', and there exists no medical science to support this! Instead what this business wants is customers, and more customers to ex-pand their business, and life-long customers, especially on cocktails of their drugs. And this vile corrupt business now which is utterly immoral targets younger and younger children for its profit. This state of affairs is really about social control. Suppressing actual dissent which can manifest by the organism as disturbance with toxic 'treatment' in the form of pills, and ECT which causes brain damage.
They have been the biggest opponents to the free use of the psychedelics, because they fear threat to their profits and so ironically support and fund a 'war on drugs'.
We HAVE to feel. We MUST feel the pain of what is going on. The natural world and us are being attacked left right and centre. Even scientists who have maybe never gone near a psychedelic are issuing warnings of the dreadful state of the ecosystem. So this is URGENT. And as far as I know it is only psychedelics which can be the REAL help when taken in a set and setting which I will summarize.
It is very complex and I am hoping people will look up my posts to help support and offer their ideas of the questions I am asking:
You mention Timothy Leary? Most people will include his name when talking of psychedelics. Apparently it was Leary who coined the term 'set&setting'. Well Leary it appears was against the Ecology movement because he thought it hindered our 'transhumanist' future involving the leaving 'womb planet Earth, and metamorphosing into different transhuman beings whilst immortally exploring the universe. he wrote all about this in his book Exo Psychology.
He, McKenna, and many of the well known leaders of the psychedelic movement spanning the generations have been psychedelic transhumanists. I view this with suspicion. Of a deliberate infiltration of peoples psychedelicized psyche. because that agenda, the transhuman (H+ for short) agenda is the globalists agenda! I am not for THAT dream/set and setting.
I am more the seeing through that, because the set and setting we so deeply and urgently need is re-CONNECTION with nature, and psychedelics wisely used can help us with this.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: