Without a clear defintion of property, we can never arrive at a place where violence is not acceptable.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Without a clear defintion of property, we can never arrive at a place where violence is not acceptable.
I don't find that to necessarily be true, and as I said before when talking to Finnian and others, I much prefer the idea of personal property as put forth by folks like Proudhon, because I see no space in a moral society for usury, and that is the difference drawn between "private" & "public" in those schools.
Is @jamesc 's 1.5 million SP personal or private property?
You haven’t clearly addressed and defined property, which is not @finnian’s shortcoming here, man.