You're not missing any argument. Open borders is the only fully consistent libertarian stance. All arguments to the contrary appeal to potential violence, utilitarian rational or are disingenuous obfuscations of libertarian principles.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think there is a minarchist case for closed borders. But I definitely do not think the case is applicable for there being a libertarian stance for be against sanctuary cities.
You like Sharia Law?
If people choose to live under Sharia who are you to say they cannot if they want to?
You love Sharia Law? You love to force people to not eat pork? You love to take rights from women and from homosexuals?