I don't know how can you compare a thief to a well respected freedom advocate?
The DAO hack was clearly a theft, the code doesn't matter, exploiting vulnerability to steal money is theft nontheless. I am anarchist, but this "code is the law" is nonsense, laws don't create morality, just as government laws are immoral, the same way exploiting private contract-code law is also immoral.
Freedom Advocate? just because he says he is it doesn't make him so. His page is full of propaganda. head to toe. No objective analysis. I am anarchist myself and I am appaled from his ways.
The DAO allowed tha vulrenability. code is law. free market in all its glory
So based on the same logic if somebody finds a vulnerability in your online bank account platform he can legally and morally empty your bank account?
The DAO investors have agreed to the code, but they haven't agreed to the vulnerability and the unforeseen thefts that could occur.
The same way if an armed robber would enter in their office, they would obviously file charges against him, and not say " well we agreed to the code, which implies that armed robbers can rob us anytime".
I don't know how can you compare a thief to a well respected freedom advocate?
The DAO hack was clearly a theft, the code doesn't matter, exploiting vulnerability to steal money is theft nontheless. I am anarchist, but this "code is the law" is nonsense, laws don't create morality, just as government laws are immoral, the same way exploiting private contract-code law is also immoral.
Freedom Advocate? just because he says he is it doesn't make him so. His page is full of propaganda. head to toe. No objective analysis. I am anarchist myself and I am appaled from his ways.
The DAO allowed tha vulrenability. code is law. free market in all its glory
So based on the same logic if somebody finds a vulnerability in your online bank account platform he can legally and morally empty your bank account?
The DAO investors have agreed to the code, but they haven't agreed to the vulnerability and the unforeseen thefts that could occur.
The same way if an armed robber would enter in their office, they would obviously file charges against him, and not say " well we agreed to the code, which implies that armed robbers can rob us anytime".