Steemit is not anarchic. Not by a longshot. I debunk every single point you make here. Steemit so far is based on inherited plutocracy.
https://steemit.com/anarchy/@kyriacos/no-steemit-is-not-anarchic-so-what-is-it
Steemit is not anarchic. Not by a longshot. I debunk every single point you make here. Steemit so far is based on inherited plutocracy.
https://steemit.com/anarchy/@kyriacos/no-steemit-is-not-anarchic-so-what-is-it
Ha! Trick's on you! I see you made a whopping $3.65 on your post. How is that possible in a plutocracy? /sarc
@richhersey
it actually proves my point. Much like the outside world people suck up to those who support their view. the only difference is that in here instead of statist sheeple you have anarchic sheeple.
Yes, a plutocracy. In real life, plutocratic societies are rife with poverty, illiteracy and disease. The 50 whales that rule over the krill would require an army and a secret police to hang on to power... and avoid being killed in a popular uprising.
85% of people in Steemit earn less that a dollar per post.
do the math
This post is very interesting, but I have to agree with @kyriacos, Steemit is currently plutocracy.
Also, I would not consider a social media platform as a model for real-life management of human societies, where many other factors are involved.