Yes, nearly every school of thought that condones the violent subjugation of mankind ("government" and "authority") opposes the idea of not having a ruling class. What a shock. If you think non-aggression, peaceful coexistence and voluntary interaction is "immoral and stupid," then I won't waste time trying to tell you anything new.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How did Pythageros overcome the corrupt ruling class of his time? Surely, not through anarchy. But rather educated men, the informed men then where able to make better decisions for themselves. Together, with the teacher attacked the root cause.
I've watched some of your videos, read this and that of your material. Agreeing with certain elements, however, once the anarchists dissent it gives rise to other threats which where not perceived. To each their own.
Let's see. Wars, police states, famines, economic turmoil, and blatant lies from government are a perpetual fact throughout history. Centralization magnifies the consequences of an individual's error into catastrophy over and over.
But those who say the system is broken to the core, and that those are features rather than bugs, and demonstrate by reason and evidence why individualist decentralization of authority is better are to be dismissed out of hand.
Seems legit.