Ruling classes train their human livestock much the way other animals are trained. It is a gradual process, modifying both perceptions and behaviors in a way that cannot be done instantaneously. For example, it doesn’t matter how loudly you yell at a wild wolf, or how hard you hit it—it’s not going to sit and roll over just because you tell it to. You have to methodically conquer it, control its will, and then use reward and punishment to train it to obey you.
Likewise, the intrusive, demeaning, immoral and oppressive crap that most humans put up with these days from “government” is not something that a free person could be quickly trained to tolerate. Instead, very gradually, one small step at a time, most of the species homo sapiens has been successfully “domesticated,” manipulated into being obedient and easily managed livestock.
Indeed, most humans have been trained so well that they voluntarily and unwittingly train the next generation of livestock to think and act similarly. And the livestock will even parrot irrational excuses for their own subjugation, believing that if their kind (the mere peasants) were truly free, that would lead to chaos and mayhem.
Consider a few aspects of authoritarian domination that most Americans quietly submit to today which they never would have put up with if they hadn’t been phased in over years, or even generations. Not only do they comply and obey with these degrading practices, but most of them zealously make excuses to justify their own mistreatment.
1 - Theft and extortion.
Perhaps the most obvious example is not only the amount of wealth that the ruling class directly steals from productive people by way of “taxes,” but the number of ways in which that theft occurs. If you own property, you will pay the protection racket known as “property taxes” or men with guns will come steal your property. If you earn a living, several levels of professional parasites claim the right to a cut of it. But the list goes far beyond that.
When you go shopping, the people selling you things have to rob you a little on behalf of the ruling class (and call it “sales taxes”). And many of the things you buy were also the subject of all kinds of “excise” taxes, which increase the price you pay. If you own a car, you have to pay off the politicians every few years (they call it “registering” your car) or bad things will happen to. And so on, and so on, and so on.
(There is also the fraudulent theft that is done in the name of “monetary policy,” where dollars are constantly devalued by creating more out of thin air. It may not technically be a tax, but it amounts to the same thing since it constitutes the theft of everyone else’s buying power.)
The number of different “taxes,” and the total amount stolen from people, has expanded enormously in just a few generations. As an illustration, the American Revolution was due in large part to tiny taxes on tea and pieces of paper. There was no general sales tax or income tax in the colonies. Most of the colonists never even met a tax collector, never filled out a form, and never paid a tax themselves.
It took nearly a hundred years before the ruling class ever attempted the first income tax in this country, in 1861—which applied only to a tiny percentage of the population, and took only a small percentage of their wealth. But via the classic “boiled frog” method, it has slowly been ratcheted up over the years, hitting more and more people, and stealing more and more wealth.
Notice that in 1913 the tax started at 1% for any “net income” received in excess of $3,000 annually. In current dollars that would mean no federal income for anyone receiving $75,000 annually or less, and a tax of $750 for someone with a “net income” of $150,000.
Today things are literally a hundred times worse than they were just before the Revolution, yet the modern livestock have been successfully trained over time so well that they do little more than occasionally grumble, with no sign of even passively resisting, much less taking up arms against the thieves. Had the U.S. ruling class, in the very beginning, attempted to steal around half of the income of a huge percentage of the population, there would have immediately been another revolution. Or, more likely, the people would have just laughed at it and ignored the demands, which would have been immediately unenforceable.
As another bit of perspective, this country has a rich history of violent resistance to taxation, even after the Revolution (and after the new ruling class started robbing the people). There was a time when moonshiners would literally tar and feather—or just shoot—“revenuers” trying to rob them or shut them down.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/edible-innovations/moonshine4.htm
And that was just in response to a “tax” on alcohol, not a tax on most people’s livelihoods. Modern subjects are rather less “uppity” than they have been in the past, with many of them eager to make excuses for widespread authoritarian extortion, and eager to condemn anyone who doesn’t cooperate with his own robbery.
The point is, statists never think or argue from actual principles; they argue from the perspective of whatever level of authoritarian domination exists right now, and make excuses for it. The average statist in 1900 would be appalled at the suggestion that there should be the level of taxation, regulation and legislation that exists right now, but would also zealously defend and make excuses for most of the taxation, regulation and legislation that existed in 1900, although that was far worse than what a statist from 1800 would have condoned.
At no point is the statist at all objective or principled when it comes to saying how much authoritarian control there should be, and how much freedom there should be. Their position is always massively biased based on whatever level of intrusion and control they grew up around, and have gotten accustomed to. They object to the suggestion that there should be much more authoritarianism than that, but also object to the idea of having much less authoritarianism than that.
For example, the average voter would view it as “draconian” and “extreme” to cut the federal budget in half, even though it was only about fifteen years ago when it was half the size it is now. But they would also complain about doubling the federal budget. Likewise, cutting taxes in half across the board, or doubling taxes across the board, would both be viewed by many Americans as too drastic. In other words, they think they are just about the right amount of oppressed, robbed and controlled right now, and don’t want any significant change in any direction.
(In the other two parts of this series we will examine other examples of how human beings are slowly trained to become accustomed to, tolerant of, and even attached to their own domination and oppression.)
(Larken Rose is a speaker, author and activist, having advocated the principles of non-aggression, self-ownership and a stateless, voluntary society for over twenty years. Donations to help support his articles, videos and other projects can be made by PayPal to "[email protected]" or by Bitcoin to 13xVLRidonzTHeJCUPZDaFH6dar3UTx5js.)
By paying their taxes, those who profess to be good and moral are absolutely responsible for the evils done in their name by their governments. They are allowing for murder and destruction on a global level. Without the support of the taxpayers governments could not operate.
As you have demonstrated with your own freedom, removing this support is crucial to successfully ending the tyranny of government.
"...They are allowing for murder and destruction on a global level..." While this is true, I'd say that it is not sufficiently precise. People who "pay" taxes are not "allowing" this destruction. "Allowing" implies that they have some kind of control over the money that is taken from them., and you know that is not the case.
The people who have money taken from them have a poor choice. They can cough up the money demanded from them by the psychos, or they can refuse, and face the consequences.
Either way, if they earn money in the market place, violence will ensue. The only thing that they can influence is whether the guns of the politicians will be pointed at them or some other poor bastard.
Call it what it is "..their taxes..." is just protection money paid to racketeers.
It's quite rational for people to hand over the money in order to pay off those that would otherwise attack them.
It's difficult to condemn a man who can only see these as his only options.
Most people are not familiar with game theory...... and how the state plays the "prisoner dilema" with them every day.
(I do not intend to seem like a pedant, but using phrases like "their taxes" and "their governments" has a kinda ring of inevitability about it. Y'know, as if people have taken ownership of or at least are willing to accept these things as their own. Yugh - creepy)!
Cowards
Are you saying that a guy, held at gunpoint in an alleyway, hands over his wallet is acting cowardly? (Even if the victim knows that some of his stolen money will likely be used to finance future violent behaviour).
Surely, most people have dependants. To refuse to hand over the wallet carries a high risk of death. To resist is likely to cause his dependants great future financial hardship.
To insist that this man is a coward seems to be quite a leap.
To make a judgement like that requires knowledge of the victim and his circumstances.
I'm just curious to learn on what is this judgement based. (I may not be following the logic here)
"But what about the roads!?" Just kidding :). All joking aside, I find it hilarious when statists (archonists, more aptly named by Mark Passio by just using the derivation and word etymology more distinctly) go on about how taxes pay for roads, but none ever mention their disgust towards the billions and millions spent on murdering people around the world using bullets, drones, bombs, poisons, theft via taxation, etc. It's all well and good they may say that we have taxation so that we can have roads and the rest is "necessary evil". It literally sickens me to the deepest of my core that the average person of this mindset is literally okay with the raping, pillaging, plundering, thieving and murdering of innocents just for some concrete roads that could otherwise be created using voluntary workers and could be provided by donations for all those who wish for such roads to be made and used.
I thankfully saw through the veil at an early age. Wild wolf for life Howwoooo
It drives my nuts when people who are defending their own subjugation & calling for mine, say that I'm the bad guy for telling them they are supposed to be free. Thanks Larken!
"....defending their own subjugation..." is not the problem. "...calling for mine..." is the unfortunate part, I'd say.
Thomas Sowell sad something similar to what you said......“I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
your article is very nice I am excitedly waiting for the next part @larkenrose
This is even more relevant and needed to be explained in Norway where if you add up all hte taxes and fees on products it amounts to likely 60% of all the money we earn. some 60% of hte price of a new car is fees going to the gouvernment, every product except food have a 25% tax called (directly translated) "moreValueTax" (mva - meir verdi avgift). Norway is of the most expensive Countrys to live in mostly as a result of taxes.
But lets not forget that we do ahve alot easyer living conditions today then hve been for along time in known history, but yes at a huge cost to our true freedom.
We should start at the school level... making sure the children are not programmed for subservient and thoughtless behaviorism.
End "government" schools then. He who pays the piper calls the tune. The state will only teach subservient & thoughtless behaviorism.
my kids are homeschooled.
This is great one..This every part just outstanding ..Thanks for sharing...Best of luck...
A few years after 911 it took me a few days to get started on a full 180 turn around which probably did happen for another year or so. Now my wife is coming along but still a long way to go. That's how well there system works. And I was born skeptical of what I was seeing, got indoctrinated over the years and then had to retrain myself back to my initial and natural instincts. I am still working on it. Uv and Rs, Looking forward to the next post.
voluntaryism one kind of social work.every nation has a goverment.we need a goverment for peaceful country.politician love people and they dedicate their life for the nation people.......thanks for sharing
Well, no. Politicians are unnecessary, unproductive violent parasites who have to continually pretend to be "serving" their victims in order to continue their scam.
I don't mean to be rude but, @beautybox that is blatantly insane. You must be ignoring reality to make a statement like this one. "Government" for peace?!?!? That's just crazy, they are the cause of all war. Politicians love people & dedicate their lives for the nations people?!?!? They are liars, crooks, sexual preditors & murderers who only care about furthering their own power. I pray you'll wake from your slumber & recognize you do not need a master to rule & control you & neither does any of your brothers or sisters.
Honesty politics is the most important for us, but dishonest politics did't carry for us . anyway , honest is the best policy . thank so...... much for sharing. all the best
These people you call statists seem to be increasing in proportion in the population, and their affinity for enslavement to be increasing. Given that violent oppression is the mechanism used to cull the herd, it seems reasonable to propose that evolution is increasing the survival of slaves, and decreasing the survival of free people.
We are being bred for slaves.
Thanks!
Actually, until recently about 100% of the population was statist. Only recently have significant numbers of people started to give up the superstition of "authority"--particularly political "authority."
I seem to recall some significant numbers of folks in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that made anarchy a household word.
Tens of thousands were killed in battles against government forces. Propaganda by deeds was abandoned when it proved ineffective, but there was certainly a ferment of ideas at the time, and there was no lack of anarchists.
There have been freedom fighters for as long as there has been consciousness, forever basically. However the idea of a voluntary society (anarchy) has always been seen as radical. The change we are seeing now, is self rule seems the most rational choice.