Not that Dan and Ned have not already answered this question...
Should we not consider Steemit(the website) the property of specific people?
If people want to communicate direct through the Steem blockchain, nothing is stopping them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
so is it "the property of specific people" or is it the property of anyone that makes an account and uses it? I think a lot of people on steemit if were told by the people that own it that the users do not own it that there might be a problem.
hope that makes sence
"If people want to communicate direct through the Steem blockchain, nothing is stopping them."
If someone owns SteemPower than they own some percentage of the blockchain, not the website Steemit.com.
But, maybe that is just too complicated for the average person to understand.
If people want to communicate direct through the Steem blockchain, nothing is stopping them.no one said anything about communicating on steemit, it was about ownership.
If someone owns SteemPower than they own some percentage of the blockchain, not the website Steemit.comare they not part of the same thing? can the site survive without the blockchain or vice versa?
But, maybe that is just too complicated for the average person to understandor maybe your just being a pretentious prick making comments like that. you must be so much more intelligent then the average person. lol
"no one said anything about communicating on steemit, it was about ownership."
Yep, I got the : "Throwing me out of your property"
But what about the : "I can still continue to call you an asshole"
Can the site survive without the blockchain?
Yes, Steemit.com could present something to the users other than the information from the Steem Blockchain(and Ledger).
Can the blockchain survive without Steemit?
Yes, if Steem still exists other sites like https://my-steemit.com/ can provide the ledger information secured by the Steem blockchain, despite the lack of the existance of Steemit.com.