Here are 9 points from my original comment
- A public threat was not made, but there definitely was a private threat that existed.
- Ben Farmer contacted a middle party, hence the screenshots that @Kafkanarchy leaked.
- @Kafkanarchy believed that an unchecked danger exists when political operatives like Farmer feel the need to reach out to materially affects his life.
- @Kafkanarchy's spirited response represents a combined effect from the middle party's personal views as well as @Kafkanarchy's understanding of what could be at stake (life, reputation, family, career, etc.)
- Farmer and Kokesh campaign use relative silence and rhetorical methods to disrupt a proper redress of @Kafkanarchy's grievance. The intention was to discredit Kafkanarchy. This is typical of their brand.
- Farmer allowed @Kafkanarchy to continue his request to redress his grievances, while seeking for openings in your story that naturally exist due to protecting the various parties involved requiring privacy.
- He attempted to punish @Kafkanarchy's persistence by gradually trying to catch his followers in rhetorical traps in rationalizing what was going on
- This lead to @Kafkanarchy's own personal reputational harm as people posted videos on youtubes to discredit his efforts
- While being whistleblowed was not expected by Farmer, he still used @Kafkanarchy's response to try to cause further reputational harm anyway, thus proving that his only concern has been the same as when he originally contacted the middle party to intervene.
My challenge is what will be done to thwart the tendency of operatives like Farmer who go beyond political decency and start stooping to mob boss tactics.
You said in your first comment:
And then in your second:
If the lid being blown off was not expected, how could one assert the plot a mere “pretext”?
Are you saying that, in your view, the plot and threat was real, but then once cover was blown, the situation was further manipulated by Farmer to do even more harm?
In my view the plot and threat was real, but once cover was blown, Farmer manipulated the situation by not legitimizing your grievances and then trying to frame you up by using others to manipulate your responses until they could construct a narrative where you are the perpetuator rather than them.
Got it. Thanks for the clarification.
Whether he directly contacted these losers writing articles like this to do so or not, I definitely do get the impression they’re trying to “get a rise” from me.
I would start to use your experiences to do something constructive like start informing others about the importance of proper information security and start to add value to the discussion by changing your goals. At this point this is the best use of your talents and platform.
As if exposing this kind of evil is not “constructive.” Makes me wonder who is behind this newly created account of yours. Damage control?
If not, and if you are sincere...No way.
This is a disgusting revelation that needs to be trumpeted far and wide. To advocate a kind of “just let it go” approach is, to me, highly suspect.
As for cyber security, etc, I am already engaged in projects to that end.
Thanks.
I didn't really mean to imply that you should stop going after Ben Farmer, I was just suggesting adding in content that illustrates a more detailed approach on somethign like cyber defense, so that your platform, and your circle of influence can probably benefit because if they came for you then what will stop the next person from coming for them.
Good call. Thank you.
Fantastic point! I agree that Kafka needs to expose his hacker or admit that he is a hypocrite.
Posted using Partiko Android
That should be pretty simple to do Kafka. Expose your hacker.
Posted using Partiko Android
https://twitter.com/GarionDocument1
For clarification Ben is still Mia. My family and friends aren't doing this for ben
Posted using Partiko Android
Well. Except Kafka DID do those things, didn't he?
Posted using Partiko Android