"Instead, it puts peoples’ hopes in the outcome of an election, and the possibility of President Kokesh signing an “Executive Order” to make the U.S. “government” cease to exist. To be blunt, never in a million years will that happen, and having that be the stated goal is both philosophically hypocritical and tactically delusional."
That's predicting the future and a non starter in the logic dept. You don't even know what's going to happen tomorrow. Do you only try sure things? If it looks impossible, what? - just don't even try? People's hopes? Do you think we are all too stupid to know what a long shot this is?
"Notice the complete lack of any mention of anything about the philosophy of voluntaryism/anarchism. Instead, it’s all about his master plan for when he gets elected. Again, since he has no chance of winning, I won’t bother covering in great detail all the ways in which his plan is inherently bogus, such as:"
You are nitpicking like there's no tomorrow. I suppose that if we reached a state of total freedom, you'd object to it because it wasn't done the right way? Would you stand so hard on principle that you'd crush the solution? Do you object to using the corrupt system against itself in order to destroy it? That doesn't make sense to me.
Your last paragraph starting with "As such" is just a hit piece and way below Larken Rose to say all that illogical nonsense.
I hope part 2 deals with the world we live in because if you think the elite are going to sit on their hands while we wait for 25% of us to become Anarchists, you're forgetting the lengths to which they are trying to keep us from learning the truth about anything. That's delusional imho.
Please excuse/forgive the tone in places. I always bristle when I think someone is being treated unfairly. I care not who. I wish you'd stop and question a few things but I don't know if you still can. You've thought very deeply about so much that maybe your conclusions are beyond question. I don't know but I wish you'd try to help your brother, Adam instead of whatever the heck this is. You KNOW he is not trying to be emperor. lol enough aleady
So you don't want to wait until "25% of us to become Anarchists" ... before trying to vote an anarchist into office? Do I need to explain the math here? And no, you not liking something doesn't automatically make it a "hit piece." As for "predicting the future," do you think every imaginable event is equally likely? For example, if Adam said he was going to flap his arms really fast and fly to the moon, would you get angry at me if I said that was never going to happen? It's clear that you WANT to believe that Adam's agenda has a chance. But it doesn't. At all. And for him to lead people like YOU on, making them think that is the answer, is counter-productive.