thank you for agreeing that bullying is the way to go.
Anyway - you do you. Enjoy playing with just a few who say that they believe in freedom but really believe in forcing their opinion on everyone else.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
A lot of them are the same. Birds of a feather. they say one thing and do another.
Since this post was made by a favourite, suddenly, no one thinks anymore. They throw their full weight behind it.
Please explain to me how filtering my feed is bullying.
Please explain how acting according to my principles in not supporting supporters of tyranny is forcing my anything on anyone.
Or revise your statement because it's completely based on fallacies and falsehood.
I don't care what you do with your feed. I care about that a person who is a witness - a person with lots of influence - is writing a post like this. Just by offering this tool, it is a call to action. And in his original post, he also mentioned downvoting.
If you are in position of power, you need to be careful what you put out there.
Calling people who post to both chains "milkers" is a value judgment - again, an invitation for the masses to act out in a negative way.
If he wants to do the tool for himself and not support people that post to both - even that is questionable in his position. To me, as a witness, I expect him to look out for the good of all users.
What you do - and I don't think you are a witness - I don't really care about.
What he is doing- I do care about.
There are apps that post to both chains. So, if people want to be part of his projects, they need to stop using Actifit for example?
And if they do, it puts the app in a bad position. Maybe they want to support the health of people that are on Steem as well...
All of that - consequences of this post - amount to bullying.
I am standing firm on this.
We certainly disagree. I will neither compromise that @arcange has a right, even a duty, to have carefully considered opinions and share them as he will. His opinions, as you note, are highly informed and therefore should be valued by folks like you and I, who do not have his wealth of information and consideration he has gained through undertaking his long service to our community.
None of your remarks has considered either his human rights, nor his advanced understanding of the topic of discussion. Perhaps you might re-evaluate your beliefs in the light of that informed understanding that seems to contradict them, something you seem not to have entertained for even a moment.
I have found that process, of re-examining beliefs, to be one of the most challenging undertakings I have ever attempted, but found the rewards to be equally bountiful to the challenge required. I highly recommend it.
Well, you must know what my thought process is or was. How you know what I considered or not, I don't know.
And I agree with you that we will disagree on this subject.
We reveal our thoughts in our words. I pointed out the failure on your part to address the issues mentioned. If you considered them, you didn't mention it.
Now you know how people can tell what you think of things when you tell them what you think.
At least there's something we do agree on.