It is clearly obvious that all the references you gave do belong to @daio.
You are simply trolling genuine artists as you previously did with @yakubenko and you did fail in both cases.
For next time, try to utilize your skills in finding real plagiarizers.
The reference does not belong to daio, as you can see in the comment above its a pocyrighted image by another author, in the case of yakubenko, its exactly the same, shes making a derivative work of a copyrighted photograph without permission from the author, which is required, and without even crediting the author.
you are not sensible!
???
hi @bluemist!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/87122581@N06/8688993467/
"All rights reserved"
I really like his hand, but he has to learn to cite the sources ...
I should not indicate the source of the photo which I draw
yes, you should, the photographer is another artist from whom you are taking creative work from, hence you should credit the author of the photograph or the photograph itself
This is not called plagiarism! This is an art loan!
Read the meaning of the word plagiarism!
plagiarism is taking the work of others and passing it as your own without crediting the authors. In this case the photographer created his work of art/composition, your work is completely based on the work of art of the photographer, a derivative work, and you dont credit the author, hence, its plagiarism.
Additionally, you dont have permission to monetize derivative works of that copyrighted photograph, so you are also infringing copyright law.
Borrowing is not prohibited by law! Do not confuse these things! Plagiarism is the appropriation of work!
You can find more about what art plagiarism is here: https://steemit.com/abuse/@jaguar.force/what-is-art-plagiarism-by-francis-leverett-golden
What is prohibited by law is making a derivative work of a copyrighted work and monetizing it as you are doing without permission of the author of the original to do so.