Personally, I do not see any insults in the post and even in the comments.
What I see is that there are different opinions about whether or not there is plagiarism.
Admittedly, the discussion is not very constructive since everyone simply camps on their positions. But we can not consider it as insults, even if I can imagine that you are feeling an offense.
The main goal of my hit-parade is not to report about the content of the posts, but how they perform on the blockchain. Even if it is about an "unpleasant" post, it is also a way of stimulating the debate by giving some attention to it.
plagiarism is attempting to pass the work of others as your own,
in this case the original work of art is the photograph, of which you then made a derivative work, without crediting the original work, hence, its plagiarism.
Additionally, you are violating the copyright law by monetizing the derivative work without permission from the author.
There are no insults, only facts, the user based the piece on a photograph which is copyrighted, and since she doesnt have permission from the author of said photograph, she cannot monetize derivative works as this piece.
The fact that you are stupid and do not know the Law! What you read from the Internet will not help you! It is necessary not only to read, but also to understand the meaning of words!
Dear @daio,
Personally, I do not see any insults in the post and even in the comments.
What I see is that there are different opinions about whether or not there is plagiarism.
Admittedly, the discussion is not very constructive since everyone simply camps on their positions. But we can not consider it as insults, even if I can imagine that you are feeling an offense.
The main goal of my hit-parade is not to report about the content of the posts, but how they perform on the blockchain. Even if it is about an "unpleasant" post, it is also a way of stimulating the debate by giving some attention to it.
He says that I am a rip-off! This is not an insult! read the meaning of the word - plagiarism !!!!!!!!!!!!!
plagiarism is attempting to pass the work of others as your own,
in this case the original work of art is the photograph, of which you then made a derivative work, without crediting the original work, hence, its plagiarism.
Additionally, you are violating the copyright law by monetizing the derivative work without permission from the author.
what is copyright? she painted a picture! this is no longer a picture! this is no longer a photo!
This is called artistic reciprocity!
There are no insults, only facts, the user based the piece on a photograph which is copyrighted, and since she doesnt have permission from the author of said photograph, she cannot monetize derivative works as this piece.
The fact that you are stupid and do not know the Law! What you read from the Internet will not help you! It is necessary not only to read, but also to understand the meaning of words!