The photograph is copyrighted, hence, the user needs permission of the author to monetize derivative works, you should know this as a SteemCleaner, the author could easily pull a DMCA on steemit for this, and you know it. Additionaly the author of the photograph is not even credited, so yes, its plagiarism.
he is clearly not the author of the photograph of himself, and that photograph is not known to be copyrighted, as is the case with the photograph of the girl with the leaves.
The photograph is copyrighted, hence, the user needs permission of the author to monetize derivative works, you should know this as a SteemCleaner, the author could easily pull a DMCA on steemit for this, and you know it. Additionaly the author of the photograph is not even credited, so yes, its plagiarism.
ok.... but it is obvious ..
she herself posted the photo not having cited it ..
look explain again! I have painted @ned
I painted him according to his photo!
it was also drawn by other Steemit users!
https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXvUscM9fV9oZK4z6X41QWP6jjtmH2yXZdgqSjfMZvGUs
and many more artists painted him. Is it plagiarism?
In that case no, cause that photograph of Ned is not known to be copyrighted.
hhaha) he didn't let me draw it
he is clearly not the author of the photograph of himself, and that photograph is not known to be copyrighted, as is the case with the photograph of the girl with the leaves.