Yes, art changes with culture, but the history of art, and the ways and reasons for its evolution is more complicated than your presentation. Also, I'm not totally sure what your central idea is either. Artist's, whether shown in museums, galleries, or independent institutions, or not have been defining the visual landscape of culture for centuries. What do you mean by "all types of art is going to be consumer product for the masses"? Also, saying anything is art is a bit too simple, don't you think? I'm not trying to advertise my feed, but I've outlined some 'criteria' for evaluating exhibitions and art in an earlier post, I think it would be informative for you to check out. Let's discuss @steeminator3000!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well I really think calling everything art is a little too simple however whenever I go to an exhibition that is what I'm facing maybe I'm to dull to understand modern art or I'm too old minded when it comes to that topic but I don't know. To be honest I worry about the fact that lots of things is going to called art also will do thanks for this insightfull comment.