additionally the source needs to be cited VISUALLY, since its an image that its being copied,
in the case of texts we use quotes, in the case of images the image needs to be show at the same size of the copied work at least
you can see that its a copy drawing if you compare both drawings, my (the copy drawing) and the original - you can see that at the shading. for example, the shading of the fin is in the original bigger and in my copy drawing it is more tuned to the fin. the work is not stolen, it is a copy drawing, (trace? how @johnwatson said, i dont know if this word fits it better)
i see that the problem is that i didnt mention the original work and the artist. and of course i edited the post. i never said that it was my own idea. even when @johnwatson ask me but even then i didn't specify the artist. my mistake because i didn't get the idea to say that.@johnwatson, i have now edited the other posts too with mentioning the artist.
i have now posted this comment 4 times, i hope you guys will not mark it as spam
No direct comment on the matter, but he does have the courtesy of editing the post with a notice about how this is a derivative work.
He did not add that footnote on the other posts in the series, though!
your postI also found the comment by @luegenbaron on about @oendertuerk's shady business in the science section quite intruiging!
despicable!
welcome back :)
additionally the source needs to be cited VISUALLY, since its an image that its being copied,
in the case of texts we use quotes, in the case of images the image needs to be show at the same size of the copied work at least
I thought they had reformed. I think we may have seen enough to constitute an SFR ban if that had not already been done. For shame!
Posted using Partiko Android
you can see that its a copy drawing if you compare both drawings, my (the copy drawing) and the original - you can see that at the shading. for example, the shading of the fin is in the original bigger and in my copy drawing it is more tuned to the fin.
the work is not stolen, it is a copy drawing, (trace? how @johnwatson said, i dont know if this word fits it better) i see that the problem is that i didnt mention the original work and the artist. and of course i edited the post. i never said that it was my own idea. even when @johnwatson ask me but even then i didn't specify the artist. my mistake because i didn't get the idea to say that. @johnwatson, i have now edited the other posts too with mentioning the artist.
i have now posted this comment 4 times, i hope you guys will not mark it as spam