You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Art and Creativity: The Saga of the Tormented Artist-- Is Suffering Required for Creativity?

in #art7 years ago

At school teachers despise you if you draw in class or you show some artistic needs.

I was constantly doodling, to be sure... and often handed in homework with elaborate patterns and scrollwork in the margins. For me, that was mostly a way of "self-regulating" my ADHD... as long as I was drawing on something, I could actually hear and absorb what the teachers had to say. Of course, back then (1960's, early 1970's) the mental health profession and educators had not yet figured out that such an approach was actually helpful... I managed to make it through school with primarily A's and B's.

I do agree that art is a language-- and thanks for bringing that up. Art isn't just "art" to me, it's a type of visual communication. I am not always entirely sure what the message is... but my wife refers to it as "channeled communication," and I'm good with that characterization.

Art seems to hold different "value" in different cultures. In the US (and many other industrialized societies) it seems to be held in lower esteem because it doesn't "do" something (like mow your lawn, or make toast) and so it gets either overlooked or relegated to the ranks of something that is traded because it has "value" or perhaps can be an "investment."

Which kind of sucks!

Sort:  

Yes as you say, but the concept of doodling is good for your health is pretty new ( I see a tendency of more acceptable things since the last 10 years like hypnosis, acupuncture, lucid dreaming... and art is part of that too haha) And I agree also about Art in galleries or as a hobby. It kinda sucks.

At the same time though, I can see the art field blossom in another way through movies, design and videogames and the competition there is tough. I mean, it is very easy to find a tight community of artists striving to be the best of their craft. But it is production driven and most of the time, you don't do art for the sake of art but for a team goal. But the end vision is still the same, trigger the emotion in the viewer (how we do that especially in movies is very questionable though haha).

If people don't see a purpose to art in general though I think they are quite narrow minded. When you look around, everything we have is visual and artificially created (for a good part at least). Even pens were drew before we could use it. ( But not something to teach at school, because 'Art' haha)

(sorry for the long answer, I really like the topic x))

Good points!

I think the art field may also be growing in an "accidental" way as a result of technology. At our gallery, we see more and more people who tell us they are doing "creative things" because they MISS actually "using their hands" to create. These days, all we seem to do is type on a keyboard or use a touchpad... people are starting to miss actually using their hands-- rather than technology-- to create. And so, some of the "art therapy" (and other things) you mention are becoming more and more popular.