i do think there are more visual and sensory thinkers, ie, artists, and then more linear thinkers like scientists who are not moved by shapes, colors and sensory things quite as much. However, i feel that the greatest scientists had both parts of them developed, and scientists who are also creative thinkers are the ones who make the breakthroughs: "Imagination is more important than knowledge" this holds true...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
One might argue that imagination needs to be fuelled by knowledge, as some of the most imaginative thinkers (artists or scientists) are also those who are most knowledgeable in their respective fields. I would like to think that on Steemit we foster the development of both arts and the sciences equally, or simply don't make a distinction between the two for the sake of convention.