Well on the other side of that coin, the weapon can be used against the 0.1% of society, specifically because of its decentralized nature. Therein lies the incentive to avoid violating the NAP. Covering your own ass. And the 0.1% of society has a lot more to lose than the rest of society, especially on the bottom half socio-economically speaking. I'm personally not interested in participating in anything like this, but as a thought exercise it seems to have internal consistency IMO.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: