•Saying you "don't know" does not absolve you of the risks you incur from not knowing.
•The burden of proof lies with the person taking the risk not the person providing the warning.
"Burden of Proof Reversal fallacy"
•You have to decide what negative assurances you need to walk out into the Serengeti having been warned that the opposite of what you hope is true.
•You require 100% proof on the warning side but 0% proof on the assurance side.
I want proof not logical fallacies. I do not care on what side the truth falls on. That is why I am natural on the subject. I would be happy with the truth no matter if god was real or not, all that matters to me is the truth.
I seriously cant continue reading this tonight, tomorrow I will try to go back to it and respond to it fully. fallacies are not proof, they are faulty logic.
have a great evening
Sorry, you will not get proof. You can't seem to break out of that paradigm.
At best you will get an understandable signal from the noise. And you can't get that from a forum discussion. Seek, and you will find. Demand proof and you will not.