Well that settles it. Because agrestic and johngreenfield think it's ok.......even though Corrupt British drug giant GlaxoSmithKline was found in EU court documents to have known their vaccine caused autism.....I guess I'll go get stabbed in the arm. What could go wrong?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
According to NaturalNews.com, that well known reputable source of scientific news.
I counter with: https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/italian-court-awards-compensation-autism-problem-unreliable-expert/
Apparently just pasting links to third party sites is all that is needed to refute a claim.
Edit: Also unable to verify the part where GSK admit their vaccine causes autism, 404
http://www.gsk.ca/english/docs-pdf/product-monographs/infanrix-hexa.pdf
oh and I do believe that does in fact settle the argument that the "statistic" that you had issues with was after all from a source provided by @truthtrain
This is becoming like something out of the twilight zone, maybe you guys are from a parallel dimension where Big Pharma and the NWO are intentionally infecting kids with fungi through the vaccines.
And john is a reliable expert ?
On whether your sources provided that bullshit statistic? Erm, I guess so?
Enlighten me, what exactly qualifies you to make such bold claims?
Not bad.....but, the damaging GSK Report IS available on the link you posted and was evidence in the case. Going to get my shot now...wish me well.
404 error for me buddy, wanna download it and host it elsewhere for me to peruse? There's a supposed screenshot, but since the fabled document doesn't exist, it's validity comes into question, although I'm sure you disagree with that
Here ya go: https://autismoevaccini.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/vaccin-dc3a9cc3a8s.pdf
haha holy shit, are you for real? I looked through that document, autism is mentioned 11 times, and wanna know what it says? No or unresolved, it doesn't prove a direct link at all.
I wasn't the Judge Brother, I'm just sharing the "facts" of the case. From the article YOU provided...
I'm starting to think you don't actually read any of these articles. You were absolutely right to put facts in quotation marks. I am genuinely lost for words at the lack of reason or ability to apply logic here, it's worrying.
Again, this was from the article YOU provided. I guess you didn't read it...
I am still struggling to see your point here. That post explains why the article you posted to me was flawed. They state their sources. What are you getting at?
Also, what exactly do you think makes a judge qualified to make a call on whether vaccines cause autism or other developmental disabilities?
I don't think they are qualified. I think they are just as corrupt as the ones trying to sell us vaccines.
So what on earth is your point then? If you doubt the judges ability to make that call, why are you pushing it as proof? I see now no matter what you are presented with, you don't wanna go outside your comfort zone and challenge your own perspective of things.