Makers of all kinds of stuff list all kinds of stuff as a possible side-effects even if it is not proven or sometimes disproved just to make sure they don't get sued. It's much easier to print it on there and give a good reason to judges to dismiss lawsuits against them right out of the gate instead of having to litigate them and try to prove the lack of a connection which will be costly, lengthy and detrimental in terms of PR. That's why some smartphone makers might list that their devices may cause cancer despite the fact that the correlation remains undemonstrated and unlikely for not. It's a legal strategy that protects them from lawsuits.
Btw, are you sure that vaccines list that as a possible side-effect anyway?
Why not? There is a much smaller risk for a class-action lawsuit from people suffering from rabies than from parents of autistic children who would be wiling to sue, isn't there?
Of course, I'm not a lawyer and this is a possibility not a hard fact though I think it's a considerable one. You posed a question and I gave you a possible answer I guessed you might not have been aware of before that.
since autism is bullshit to begin with then the correlation is false.
Makers of all kinds of stuff list all kinds of stuff as a possible side-effects even if it is not proven or sometimes disproved just to make sure they don't get sued. It's much easier to print it on there and give a good reason to judges to dismiss lawsuits against them right out of the gate instead of having to litigate them and try to prove the lack of a connection which will be costly, lengthy and detrimental in terms of PR. That's why some smartphone makers might list that their devices may cause cancer despite the fact that the correlation remains undemonstrated and unlikely for not. It's a legal strategy that protects them from lawsuits.
Btw, are you sure that vaccines list that as a possible side-effect anyway?
... so some of the side-effects they failed to mention were Rabies, Morgellons and Mad cow disease?
Why not? There is a much smaller risk for a class-action lawsuit from people suffering from rabies than from parents of autistic children who would be wiling to sue, isn't there?
Of course, I'm not a lawyer and this is a possibility not a hard fact though I think it's a considerable one. You posed a question and I gave you a possible answer I guessed you might not have been aware of before that.