Pee in a cup
8 years ago in #barrycooper by barrycooper (68)
$20.70
- Past Payouts $20.70
- - Author $18.74
- - Curators $1.96
148 votes
- au1nethyb1: $8.16
- recursive: $4.96
- juneaugoldbuyer: $1.32
- nanzo-scoop: $1.31
- recursive3: $0.65
- blueorgy: $0.38
- jl777: $0.35
- will-zewe: $0.32
- jesta: $0.31
- edgeland: $0.23
- miacats: $0.20
- limitless: $0.19
- geoffrey: $0.17
- sterlinluxan: $0.16
- tim-johnston: $0.15
- faddat: $0.14
- ntomaino: $0.14
- jackkang: $0.12
- asch: $0.11
- barrycooper: $0.11
- and 128 more
What's up with your obsession with Facebook?
Before you made your comment, I thought the same thing. I did not want to continue comparing Steemit to Facebook so I changed the title. We are thinking alike. That said, Facebook has been the king for so long, I'm certain they have brainwashed me. Memes have had a HUGE impact on my life and I hate to see them go away. That's my intention.
honestly even i can create better memes, but no one upvotes them. Ofcourse you are different, high reputation +many followers+ famous. It is going to trend.
so upvoted for curation reward.
"better" is rather subjective though. And I don't particularly find your memes interesting. (Yes, I just spend some of my limited time, checking them out.)
lol. Thanks for the vote and cred to Kels.
Create a cool meme and send it to me. I'll give you 25 percent of the earnings if I like it enough to post.
Sorry...had too!!
lol. Thanks for the vote and cred to Kels.
Meme's are a different form of expression I suppose. Sometimes funny, sometimes profound and sometimes foolish. DOGE was launched from one though.
STEEMIT po ndimon shume rinine dhe pa dallim moshet
What? Porque? English por favor amigo.
While I personally don't believe it to be worth thousands of dollars, creativity should be rewarded. You have up to four posts per day to receive 100% author rewards. I personally don't think I'd use one of my posts as a meme, but you are free to do so and if it is good enough, it will make some money.
Thanks for the input @bendjmiller222. Although the title of this post could suggest I'm only out for money, I'm not. The money is attractive but it's more important for me to influence the masses with my philosophies. This post explains my motive for being here: https://steemit.com/barrycooper/@barrycooper/i-feel-like-steemit-is-my-home-is-it
Yes I'm glad that you are compensated for the work you do preventing non violent drug users from facing jail time. Once marijuana is legal (I'm pretty sure the government is more interested in tax revenue and finding a way to see if people are driving high) what will your next step be. Do you think marijuana sellers and users will be freed from prison? In Buffalo marijuana is quite common in the city and it is relatively left alone. There are houses (dispensaries essentially) that if the police cared they could raid.
You have a beautiful daughter. I hope someday the laws will allow you to return to the USA, but I don't think that is actually a goal you seek at the moment.
Having weed illegal and alcohol legal boggles my mind. I have your documentary and hope to watch soon and see what some of my favorite entertainers have to say.
What do you think of freeway Rick? I see his entrepreneurial spirit, but wish he would not have delved into a drug that seems to cause a lot of broken families and addiction. I have listened to him on the Joe Rogan experience (I bet Joe Rogan would love to have you. He's a very strong marijuana advocate and hosts one of the most interesting/diverse podcasts).
I don't know if you are familiar with it or not, but definitely worth checking out
You know a lot @benjmiller222. You are the type I am trying to attract. Your knowledge tells me you understand what's up. I starred in a drug war documentary with Freeway Rick Ross. Have you seen it. It's online now. How to make money selling Drugs is the title. I'm glad you are here. Tell all your friends about me and thanks for the love.
I have it on my list of things to watch on Saturday if time permits. I didn't know if you worked hand in hand with those in the video, or if everything was shot separately, but I should watch the video before asking questions I can most likely answer by viewing.
I have many friends who are very into marijuana and are non-violent and simply enjoy the experience. I will gladly pass along your knowledge to them and hope they will learn some great tips from you and your team of dedicated workers.
Sometimes a visual says it with much more impact. If it helps get your message across then go for it.
"hoe ass shit"
Although I for one love me some low brow humour.. When you start refering to certain acts as "hoe" stuff it might get some people's jimmies rustled up.
Not mine.. but you know... someone!
And yes it is completely ok to earn with a meme. I made a couple that earned me a little bit. People have to remember , it is a social media platform, it isn't all about crypto and programming, it's supposed to be entertaining too. Some people need to let loose a little bit.
You only make money because a whale upvotes you. Without it, nobody would care. There are plenty of good posts that receive nothing.
I fully agree there are badass posts on Steemit that never get rewarded however, a person can be rewarded by only gathering minnows and dolphins. A check of the top 50 Steemit earners will show some who rank simply by posting lots of content with no whale attention.
I didn't want to come across as attacking you. Sorry. I'm just upset that Steemit hasn't really lived up to its potential. I wrote something I think is a worthwhile read. If you agree, please help promoting it. Without people like you there is no chance of being rewarded here. Thanks. https://steemit.com/steemit/@conspiracynut/sjws-what-caused-the-rise-of-the-demons-part-one
I've had plenty of whales upvote me. No money really made though.
I just made a post, showing of the hash I bought. It's not like it's any better, than a meme. >,.,<
you shouldn't write to appease steemit. Look at my post with the picture "Fuck Steemit" basically whales have been upvoting their own bots then mass voting content that might do well to chase curation rewards. Also 1% own 90% of the SP...
Basically barry where ever i see centralized capitalistic greed chasing person i like to crush them just like they did to every single person they did because of the greed.
Thats what is happening and i hate it. I love steemit but i will not support their greed. Not all of the whales ofcourse. (You are a whale of sorts, i bet your vote carries huge weight and adds decent value!)
Of course, the sociopathic parasites exempt themselves from the law they use as a cudgel against "the little people." (We, the People)
Then again: imagine that the sociopaths use the drug testing policy against people like Ron Paul. He might pass, but would someone like Assange or Barry Cooper for Attorney General? A lawmaker that was duly-elected by a people who had finally woken up could be targeted by this change to the law.
A good rule of thumb is: Whoever the people want should be elected, and then targeted for SPECIFIC hypocrisy once elected. Barry Cooper wouldn't be a hypocrite, so, if he were elected, those demanding he be drug tested would be "in the wrong."
The problem, as it turns out, is less access to the ballot, not "too much access." The sociopaths already have ways of getting around every single harsh ballot access requirement they impose on "minor parties" and "independents." (As I believe you already know.)
Additionally, even when the sociopaths fail to meet their own ballot access requirements (Jeff Brown for TX Supreme Court; Barack Obama and McCain for President in Texas in 2008) the courts of lies simply allow them on the ballot anyway. The ballot access restrictions are LITERALLY only applied to minor parties and independents! When tyrants fail to comply, they are treated as "above the law" and included on the ballots anyway! (And the American public, sheeplike and servile as they are, sleeps through the entire process...)
Contrary to "anarchist" belief, well-organized libertarians can and do get elected to elections where fewer than 30,000 votes are contested. Those offices include Sheriff and State Legislature: Two offices capable of "State Nullification." This should happen way more than it does, but often fails to happen due to delusional belief structures about running for office.
For more on this:
https://www.libertyclassroom.com/nullification/
For example, I could get anyone elected to any office that the incumbent won with < 30,000 votes for a price of $50,000, as long as the candidate cleared everything he said and did with me, first (under penalty of repayment of a larger campaign debt). This is how Greg Dirasian elected several city councilmen in the suburbs of Detroit. It wasn't easy, but it wasn't rocket science, either. Though this is true, it's not really an offer now: the freedom movement has had people capable of this for a long time, and they don't care to pay. This sounds like "political careerism" or "being part of the problem" to you, then you should consider that the sociopath establishment values their ability to steal at vastly greater dollar amounts, and that far more money than is necessary to make libertarianism "a household name" is wasted on "SuperPACs" and "The Libertarian Party," which both are typically comprised of sociopaths who promptly burn the money.
Libertarians typically are born without a strategy gene. They literally have no natural sense of "what will work" and "what will not work." They cannot decide between a good idea, and political death. This is simply the nature of people who prioritize philosophy over "victory in war." They typically don't spend enough time on the battle field to learn what works(door-to-door campaigning) and what doesn't(printing a newsletter; etc.).
Libertarian candidates naturally want to "go their own way." This is OK, but rarely gets them elected, unless they're like Dick Randolph and have a keen understanding of the demographics of their district. (They typically do not, or else they'd simply run as Ds or Rs, which may be essential since that's what Randolph did, before switching to L. ...This is because the default of conformist voters is to be registered in a party that has won an election within the past 20 years. If you're going to sell people on "being a part of a new thing" they need to see that it has a chance of winning. ...Much like convincing people to board an experimental aircraft: Most won't do it until they see the same model flying, or until Elon Musk is strapping himself into the same one.)