I think that the distribution of the basic income should also come with the distribution of a basic knowledge, so that people can make the difference between their wills and their wants and how the wants are elaborated into their mind.
Money is a mean to reach goals, but how goals are set up ? How do you reach the conclusion that you need a wall between Mexico and USA ( to take a recent controversial example !) ?
How does community members communicate to reach goals. What is freedom ? If these problems are not solve in the mean time, then you nice new crypto can be destroy by a bunch of fundamentalist that will say for example : "basic income is against my religion". I would submit the distribution of the UBI to the fact that people have studied Marshall Rosenberg Non Violent Communication lecture.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well , I don't completely disagree with that, and it's pretty central to the first posting I made on this topic...
https://steemit.com/vivacoin/@williambanks/introduction-to-viva-a-price-stable-crypto-currency-with-basic-income-that-s-not-hypothetical