- UBI should be tagged to inflation, or mean income, or something that grows with cost of living.
- UBI should not replace disability programs. Many welfare programs can be replaced, but disability is above and beyond normal basic needs, and should maintain its own program. It also should be updated so that it doesn't disincentivize work.
- Universality is key, because anybody's income can change at any time. If it suddenly drops, people need coverage right away, rather than bureaucracy and waiting while they're suffering. If it increases, like when someone takes work, it should not be taken away, as we do with welfare, because that disincentivizes work. The way you make sure it is fair is through intelligent implementation of how UBI is funded. You set it up so that those with more wealth and incomes are the ones paying more into the program. You give everybody the floor, and then take more back from those who do extremely well and didn't need it after all. For example, give Bill Gates his $12K up front and tax an extra 10% on his income, so that, in the end, he's actually paying for many basic incomes of others.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not even shadowstats.com John Williams, whose data would not be accepted anyway by governments.
Also why give him anything upfront?
This comment has received a 20.41 % upvote from @steemdiffuser thanks to: @stimialiti. Steem on my friend!
Above average bids may get additional upvotes from our trail members!
Get Upvotes, Join Our Trail, or Delegate Some SP