Very interesting ideas @thesimpson however how would the people without jobs pay for the services in which they use? Would allocated cost be distributed to those capable of paying as such their percentage would go up? Much the same way our current take system works but in this model you’re effectively able to “allocate” your resources to those in which you use.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Those not working would attend the advice centre and receive a minimum stipend. From that theywould still have to pay the 20% tax, citizens could also see if the people claiming the unemployed stipend have ever actually contributed to the service.
I do see it as an improvement on how the tax system should currently work. Yes with payers able to allocate what their tax goes towards and also other citizens able to see in percentage form what other citizens have contributed.