RE: Is Haejin A Guru Or A Quack? Let’s Find Out

[a-dalora]

Maybe there is some confusion in using the word Fundamentals. It seems to be used in the classical sense of fundamentals of the asset by one poster, but in the sense of fundamentals of the theory. If one dismisses fundamental analysis and favors technical analysis he still has to accept the fundamentals of technical analysis to keep hies views consistent.

Comments

[lexiconical]

"accept the fundamentals of technical analysis"

Oh, you mean, exactly like he does?

Do you even know TA?

[a-dalora]

What is the intended meaning of your 'cathchline' ?

[a-dalora]

@ponts wrote:

I identified him as a quack two months ago when he made a post about EOS. I explained why elliot waves predictions does not work on an ICO that introduces 2,000,000 new tokens into the circulating supply every single day for one year.
His response was rather ignorant saying things like: "I don' care" about the token distribution, and arguing with me about how long it lasts.

My reply on @buggedout has to be interpreted in a context respecting this comment.

The point is that even if someone is believing in Elliot Waves and Technical Analysis, the ongoing distribution of tokens does not allow its application out of its own underlying ideas.

@lexiconical wrote:

Oh, you mean, exactly like he does?

Maybe you should read comments more carefully. The contrary was the statement.

Do you even know TA?

Obviously ! What about you ?