Sort:  

I had NOT called the bottom.

In haejin defense he never said it was done, he said it could be done, going over every possibility every video would take too long, you need to watch everyday and make up your own mind to what you think is going to happen.

As Haejin says on many occasion he is not a crystal ball...lol Technical analysis simply shows many ways it could work... its all about possibilities which leads to awareness.

If you are receiving this message, you have been flagged for responding to a known scammy piece of shit. Enjoy your dwindling rep. Here is how @haejin supports the community.

image

P.S. - His 21k followers are complete bullshit and most are inactive and have been for months.

read the fine lines, he did place some conditions there that BTC have to breach certain points to prove that the correction is done.

Yesterday he said it may be done. It was an alternate count (although he could have made that much clearer).

@danpaulson. Nobody has to clarify anything for you. If you are not clear enough, that's your own doing. If you want to understand in depth, my suggestion is that you read haejin's comment (or anyone else you follow) over and over again to digest it. Ultimately, you need to make your own conclusion from Haejin's info.

@adambenko. That's how it goes in trading, the chart changes all the time. If you have a better way, present it!

You need to learn how to interpret TA better, there are never certainties only possibilities and probabilities, yesterday because of the price movement an impulse was probable; it didn't pan out so now there's less probability - and that count has been moved to a back burner until it's invalidated. Once you realize this process you'll stop making silly comments.

Then what the hell is the value if it’s wrong more than 50% of the time

One can be wrong more than half the time and still make money.

Example: set stops at 20% up, and 10% down.

If you're wrong 60% of the time:

Wins: 40% x 20% profit = 800 (unit is "%%")
Losses: 60% x 10% loss = 600 (same unit)

Thus, being wrong 60% of the time can still be profitable.