"Disingenuous" might apply better to your article. Bitcoin Cash is as much a result of the scaling debate as any of the other options. This is the great divorce. The BCC people have just as much claim to the legacy of Bitcoin as the Blockstream-controlled side, if not more.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
When you are in the overwhelming minority side of the debate, like ViaBTC, and decide to launch an alternative coin, marketing it as the "real" Bitcoin, that seems pretty disingenuous to me. The other issue I am frustrated with is that they purposefully fed the FUD in order to prop-up Bitcoin Cash. We need more clarity in the cryptocurrency space, not people who are willing to publish misinformation for their own gains.