BCash is just a kick of the can, an evolutionary dead end, the hallucigenia worm of crypto. Raising the block size was never the answer. Roger is a joke but he's a great marketer. I kind of like him after all ;). Regards Task!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
With your technical background, what makes you say BCash was a farce from the start? Is there technical reasons or just common sense ones?
It's simple really. A big block containing Visa level numbers of transactions would be several gigabytes in size and impossible to transmit over internet in under 10 minutes. The internet also scaled through a second layer solution that's running on your router right now (Network Address Translation NAT) so that's why I believe they are the most likely solution. Big blocks just kick the can.
What you talking about bcashers are getting tb blocks soon. Full nodes ain't important. It up the mining pools to do it. No problem. That is totally decentralization am i right :)