If you think about it from a crypto economics perspective, what happened to Bitcoin this week with the inclusion of Ethereum on Coinbase is frankly devastating to Bitcoin’s brand image - and utility.
Coinbase, founded in 2012, sitting on a fat 4.1 million customer userbase, and backed by some of the deepest pockets in Silicon Valley... the crypto services giant had always been staunchly a believer in Bitcoin exclusivity until this week’s rollout.
As wildly exciting as the Ethereum community and ecosystem are becoming, in the back of one’s mind was the realization that it is still not in the same league as Bitcoin - can’t move it onto Coinbase and have it in my bank account as fiat currency the next day. Can’t buy it on Coinbase with a MasterCard instant buy.
Like every “alt” crypto project before it, Ethereum was relegated to a bizarre secondary realm which typically involved trading bitcoins for Ether on a third party exchange web site - or using an institutional level crypto trading platform, with the minimums and exhausting user identity processes that institutional level account openings can come with.
Now that’s all different. Coinbase has Ether on an equal footing with Bitcoin on the company’s Trade page, as shown in the screenshot below.
Full Article - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-seaman/bitcoin-the-bell-tolls-fo_b_11148312.html
Disagree.... Coinbase doesn't hold the keys to Bitcoin's success, but they might help Ethereum quite a bit--for some time.
The big difference IMO is that Bitcoin has remained censorship resistant and still somewhat anonymous. Coinbase, and Ethereum are centralized. They'll hard fork if The Man demands it. Why not just use a bank? Eventually that is whom the bell will toll for.
Completely agree with you.
Good article