I think they do obviously depress wages to some degree but on the other hand in some cases the business could not operate without them and then the Americans there wouldn't have jobs either. Clearly having robust oversight of any participating in the program is important to prevent abuse.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So now the question is, are protection of Workers a job for the federal government (like OSSA, the FTC, OR EPA), or state government? That's Regulation and Mandate to insure a minimum safety net when workers move (which they do). Vs. smaller, poorer states more likely to caterer to an industry undermining protections to fill state coffers from small lobbyist with backdoor access.
Which means if you want the first on the left, And if you want the 2nd your a conservative or republican.
And if you think the protection of workers should not be a job for the government? A safety net when people move? what is that?
What if you recognize that both the states and feds already have worker various worker protections in place?