I have no problem admitting when I am wrong. It just means i learned something. All I am doing is half heartily trying to inform you that BCC does exist and is very likely to go ahead. which will have the domino effect of creating BTC-U.
I do not see why you are disagreeing with me so strongly when this is fact?
You are claiming it is bs when it is not. Me not doing your research properly is ok. I won't hold your hand. Just give a starting point.
Can you just explain to me how BCC will not exist?
BCC said they will go ahead with the fork if "any" form of segwit is activated. They are going with big blocks only. Hey I could be wrong but I find alot more evidence for its existence than I do FUD
I never said anywhere that BCC didn't exist. Your riddles and twists remind me of the media you enjoy. BCC is the biggest joke and the market realizes that. If it had any significance the price would have already fallen. If BCC does get implemented it will be trading for less the 5$ and nobody will mine it except for viabtc. A centralized ponzi scheme where you have to risk your real bitcoin on an unkown exchange to sell your BCC for a few dollars. They will most likely disappear with everyone's bitcoin and the fork will fizzle out a few days later.
How am I speaking in riddles and twists. Sigh this is taking more effort than planned..
Ok..
If I fail in this verbal smackdown I will concede defeat. But in exchange lets just do this part nicely, leaving out all the needless crap.
You asked me to provide info on forks. I did. Correct info which you now accept. Although now claim is worthless(They are free ffs). Which could be true but does not make anything I have said incorrect. By accepting that BCC is likely also means you have to accept BTC-U will also happen.
You are focusing on me not doing your research when i only pointed out facts and quickly googled some links for you. You seem like a smart person so I figured you could follow the trail once I put you on it.
You now accept a fork is going to happen so why are you saying I am wrong?
What that I have said does not stand true?
EDIT: I got the impression of you saying BCC FUD because in the article you said:
"BCC is just another hunk of fud to cause uncertainty and I can see by reading many forums, it's working like a charm lol. I expected the market to become immune to the fud over the years but I was wrong, I guess there will always be fear waiting around every corner."
Doe's that not mean BCC is only a bullshit rumor?
This post received a 4.2% upvote from @randowhale thanks to @cyberblock! For more information, click here!
Oh and my bag of FIAT is yet to arrive. I planned ahead for the 27th so no matter what happens I am at the mercy of the market. All I have is the hope for a correction but I don't feel $2750 is a price we won't see again
How am I speaking in riddles and twists. Sigh this is taking more effort than planned..
Ok..
If I fail in this verbal smackdown I will concede defeat. But in exchange lets just do this part nicely, leaving out all the needless crap.
You asked me to provide info on forks. I did. Correct info which you now accept. Although now claim is worthless(They are free ffs). Which could be true but does make anything I have said incorrect. By accepting that BCC is likely also means you have to accept BTC-U will also happen.
You are focusing on me not doing your research when i only pointed out facts and quickly googled some links for you. You seem like a smart person so I figured you could follow the trail once I put you on it.
You now accept a fork is going to happen so why are you saying I am wrong?
What that I have said does not stand true?