Perhaps if you'd lodge aside personal attacks and had a look at facts, you'd be able to have a more meaningful discussion. I think you either don't understand how hardware wallets work or just are hell-bent on arguing. You're consistently thinking that the claim here is of a Bitcoin key being breached (when it's not); the point, again, is the hardware can be breached to expose the key.
They can be breached:
- https://cryptoinsider.com/trezor-and-ledger-are-hackable-now-what/
- https://www.google.com/amp/s/thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/03/20/ledger-nano-s-hack-cryptocurrency/amp/
- https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/03/20/ledger-nano-s-hack-cryptocurrency/
I suppose the disagreement stems from my use of the umbrella term cold storage rather than hardware wallet, which are just one type of cold storage.
And I already told you, you're welcome to find the referral on this page; there are none. I made an error in thinking if I'd say something you want to hear, you'd move on; that was a severe error on my part.
you dont differentiate anywhere between hardware wallets and true cold storage
you state multiple times all wallets are secure except for the one you are promoting
and here is the shortened link on this post to track your referrals
Fair point. I'll clarify now: this article, excluding the comments, is about only one type of cold storage: hardware wallets.
I appreciate your effort to ensure I clarify the distinction.
In the future, I'll be sure to specifically state hardware wallets when referring to only this type of cold storage, but I may possibly make a comparison with paper wallets too, and will specifically refer to them as paper wallets.
Also, you may open any of the Bitly links through this site: http://www.getlinkinfo.com. They direct to the website without any referral.