The fact that Bitcoin is not considered legal currency does not protect you from money transmitting laws. The law itself does not define money, and in many court cases, Transmitting Bitcoin is equal to transmitting money.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Actually, everything in law is defined, even money. There is Black's Law Dictionary and Bouvier's where you can look up legal definitions.
Educate yourself. You know much less than you think you do.
I am talking about a specific law, not general law. Money transmitting laws, does not need money to be defined for charges to take place. There are numerous cases already where the definition of money had no impact on court proceedings considering the transmission of Bitcoin.
We're past the point where the law as written really matters anyway. Nowadays, the law is what they tell us it is.