Does this prove the old saying, 'there's not such thing as bad publicity?'
The only advantage to rebooting as Bitconnect 2.0 instead of something completely different is name recognition. People talking about it more because bitconnect was a scam - people like you and I, that wouldn't give it two seconds thought if it were just another altcoin with zero name recognition.
I totally get that.
But, to think some people will be swindled a second time is a bit sad and hilarious. Then, how many people would be there for kicks and giggles and see if they can cash out before another exit scam?
It's a fun thing to say, but it really isn't true. Sometimes it very much is, but not always. It sounds good though.