He suggests so many possibilities it’s impossible to be wrong. And therefore following possible TAs is no better than placebo. It’s wrong more than 50% of the time. Also, it seems he often writes simply to post stuff up without regard to his own philosophies. A month ago he said correction over for XRP knowing full well about hurry up and wait for altcoins. Now he’s shilling his hurry up and wait hypothesis. Contradicting himself directly. Monetary incentive perhaps?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: