Besides, Mores Law is used more as a euphemism for rapid technological innovation. Even if Mores Law is broken, that doesn't necessarily mean much in the long run.
If you think for a minute, you realize that it cant precisely double each yearâ ď¸
its a stupid law these times.
do they want to double blocksize each yearâđ¤Ł
The blocksize can be any necessary. We might find better ways to scale in the future, who knows. LN for example is a great experiment, but unfortunately doesn't qualify yet.
Once LN or another solution works well enough, we might not need to scale further or as fast on chain. But currently on chain 0-conf transactions on Bitcoin Cash are clearly superior.
You're an idiot, as your blog can rapidly convince anyone of.
Do You think I care?
Everybody is always so sure of them selves in crypto.. Everybody shouting their favorite coin
Moore's law says otherwise. Bigger blocks is a long term exponential scaling solution.
Its not all about Moores law.. Dont make sense anymore in future.
BlockChain blocks aren't transistors
That's completely irrelevant.
Besides, Mores Law is used more as a euphemism for rapid technological innovation. Even if Mores Law is broken, that doesn't necessarily mean much in the long run.
If you think for a minute, you realize that it cant precisely double each yearâ ď¸
its a stupid law these times.
do they want to double blocksize each yearâđ¤Ł
I think you need to revisit my above comment.
The blocksize can be any necessary. We might find better ways to scale in the future, who knows. LN for example is a great experiment, but unfortunately doesn't qualify yet.
I agree that it is a very good experiment.
They should coexist.
Once LN or another solution works well enough, we might not need to scale further or as fast on chain. But currently on chain 0-conf transactions on Bitcoin Cash are clearly superior.
Segwit and small blocks breaks the chain of signatures thus do not adhere to the Bitcoin system.