I am not suggesting there should be a 50/50 distribution, I suggest that in a non-sexist situation, statistics would tend to 50/50. It is not the same
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I am not suggesting there should be a 50/50 distribution, I suggest that in a non-sexist situation, statistics would tend to 50/50. It is not the same
You tie it it to the concept 'non sexist situation'. Is everything not 50/50 distributed 'sexist' then?
Well, I see your statistics are not excelent, so end of discussion. Sorry if you fear of women taking your job, you can still go to cry at/pol/
I see only one shying away when pressed for an explanation.
There is no explanation needed. Population of the study shows aprox 50% of people in working age is man, 50% is women. If no ties, allegations, recrimination or social constructs were given (no sex-discrimination) the experiment for a big enough population will give aprox. 50% of each genders being programmers. As result of experiment shows contrary, the function that determines the posibility of access to "work as a programmer" is not "random/no discriminatory". Sorry mate, the only one who has given no explanation is you, "you are tied to recriminate sexism" is your only crybaby argument.