Alright, I try: looking at the chart right now, I would be tempted to say the better time was at the wave (A), but obviously no one is able to predict the future, and at this point it was still unsure the correction wouldn't have been an ABC lowering the price further, am I mistaken ?
If this is the case, laddering from wave (A), with some entries at much lower price, so when the ABCDE triangle is confirmed, there is still founds from untriggered buy order that can be used for a new ladder at wave (E).
But starting only from wave (E) could perhaps be seen as better because less risky, more predictable, as we are now quite sure the correction is finished
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There are 36 possible Elliott Wave corrective combinations. So, about 2% of getting it right on first try.
However, forward discernment is a skill that can grow and one can make calls like to describe...but very painful if wrong.
So better to stay on the sideline as long as possible until what appears to be the last corrective wave ?
In my opinion, I would
There are 36 possible Elliott Wave corrective combinations. So, about 2% of getting it right on first try.
However, forward discernment is a skill that can grow and one can make calls like to describe...but very painful if wrong.
There are 36 possible Elliott Wave corrective combinations. So, about 2% of getting it right on first try.
However, forward discernment is a skill that can grow and one can make calls like to describe...but very painful if wrong.