Yeah, there's a large movement that's basically anti @haejin because they feel that he is taking advantage of the Steemit platform to benefit himself. I'm not quite sure I understand their side of the argument, I figured the idea of the platform was a supply/demand based system where people are free to make as much money as the population finds value in their content.
There's either other factors at play I don't yet understand or these people are crazy, I'll let you form your own opinion there. I've seen a couple things that are alarming from this group though, for example they seem to be perfectly willing to downvote comments from minnows with low reputation if they are not onboard with the movement that seems like a sketchy practice. One of the primary advocates is named berniesanders on here which also makes me uneasy, since the US politician Bernie Sanders encourages highly immoral socialist agendas that are based around redistribution of wealth and rights to other peoples work and the actions of this user seem at face value to correlate with this value system. I will say I'd prefer to continue to see @haejin's analysis so I hope they don't drive him out of the platform or anything.
I'd like to hear the other side of the argument, I'm open to conversation and I'm fairly new here too.
You pretty much nailed it. Some of these steemit people think that there job is to make the playing field fair as that is what they believe their version of a 'free' market means. In reality free market means that things can and probably will be unfair for some due to limited financials. At the same time things rebound and they will also receive a chance of the pie. Socialists don't think think the world can work without their intervention. New Agers, free thinkers and anarchist capitalists believe that their is an equilibrium that will always balance itself therefor we don't feel the need to intervene.