But you think supporting a centralized takeover of Bitcoin is? People need to show that they DO NOT support financial institutions taking control of an open-source, decentralized project.
If Segwit2x does succeed, and they are successful -- does that not make BitcoinCash and BitcoinGold a more true form of Bitcoin? Please let me know your thoughts.
I'm a no2xer but I just think holding as much Bitcoin as possible is better than buying the forks; hodl Bitcoin, sell the fork. Maybe I'm missing something though.I can't see 2x succeeding because of the way it went with B-cash; most people sold their B-cash for more Bitcoin and B-cash is unstable and crashing now...
They already have majority support due to owning the biggest pools and others, many people are waking everyone up to the truth though. I hope it doesn't go through. Segwit is Control 1.0, we need to remove that also.
But you think supporting a centralized takeover of Bitcoin is? People need to show that they DO NOT support financial institutions taking control of an open-source, decentralized project.
If Segwit2x does succeed, and they are successful -- does that not make BitcoinCash and BitcoinGold a more true form of Bitcoin? Please let me know your thoughts.
I'm a no2xer but I just think holding as much Bitcoin as possible is better than buying the forks; hodl Bitcoin, sell the fork. Maybe I'm missing something though.I can't see 2x succeeding because of the way it went with B-cash; most people sold their B-cash for more Bitcoin and B-cash is unstable and crashing now...
They already have majority support due to owning the biggest pools and others, many people are waking everyone up to the truth though. I hope it doesn't go through. Segwit is Control 1.0, we need to remove that also.