Wouldn't it be fair and transparent to apply some analysis on everyone who doesn't set out by saying 'this is not financial advice'? If it isn't applied to everyone, it seems like targetting a single case/individual.. and a little unfair imo.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sure. If there was a major flag war and a PR nightmare in progress that was negatively affecting the platform and was centered around any other individual then that would be appropriate.
An action taken against a single person will be seen as illegitimate and easily discredited. A host of examples of abuse may already exist or certainly will arise later. If it is the case which sets the measures in place but the measures apply to everyone, I think the efforts would be better spent that way. You'd also have people from outside this flag war seeing the benefits of supporting it.
You're so nice for commenting on this post. For that, I gave you a vote!