This review was far from unbias... You left out a lot of the negatives, such as them calling themselves a modified ponzi scheme in their white paper, their website is connected to a large scheme from Russia that ripped off a lot of people and it appears as if they ripped off Bitconnect's website (or they are the same ppl). Now, if you participate in the ICO and sell your coins afterwards for a profit, this does not mean that it is not a scam. Do not justify it based on whether you get ERC20 tokens or not. It is a scam because they call it a scam. The fact that they call it a scam and there are ppl who are going to invest and say "well, ICOs are risky anyway" have lost touch with reality, are biased, and are justifying buying into it because of their greed.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
you do realise that bitconnects model is highly sustainable right? maybe for 50 years. so calling them the same people is insane, and shows you have done no research, if anyone thinks like you there would be no ICO's, stay away from the crypto community if you cannot risk that which you can afford to lose, and don't waste my time.
The review was made on what was known, falsifying identity and talking about ponzi is normal in the crypto lending community.
This clearly is no place for you, go to fiat perhaps just a suggestion.