I'm not the author of this post, but I do think it's not really right to say that there hasn't been input and effort in this post. Yes, there has been used copy/paste but the used sources are also shown under the post? Not to mention there has only been 33% of the post plagiarized (which links are mentioned, so it's actually not plagiarized). So this guy is getting flags and bad reputation because of being new and not knowing that the only thing he didn't do was quoting it? At least he put the effort in adding the sources ...
Next to that I don't really think it's fair and even normal that most of the people that flagged this post are the same user (which I'm guessing because of the usernames, they look abnormally the same, if they aren't the same people, then I never said this ...)
@steemcleaners the link you mentioned as source is 63% plagiarized from the original bitconnect site and other sites. Which means that the 33% of this post is used from bitconnect.co and not from your link.
I don't want to criticize anyone, I just think this isn't the right way of judging someone. (Especially someone who tries to help other people to get in touch with projects that can help you with investing).
My sources of plagiarism:
http://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/
