Thanks for the update.
The last list, 'top 100 distribution', seems to be a bit misleading as there are several accounts with a lot more collateralized bts, like 'alpha-dog' and 'aloha'.
Wouldn't it be more accurate to include them, or is the collateral considered lost in this statistic?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thats a great question. I have considered this in the past but never changed the dataset.
I will pose the question in tonights beyond bitcoin hangout and see what the community would prefer. I will count your vote and mine as a yes.
what city is your bitcoin hangout?
Great, thanks!
Because you could argue that those with high collateral are probably much more active on the platform and shape the system more in general than those just passively holding bts and thus more interesting to check out for future movements in the community.