Right the moment when these guys are going to be paid for results, we are going to see some progress. Until then more crappy and crappy UI will be delivered.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Right the moment when these guys are going to be paid for results, we are going to see some progress. Until then more crappy and crappy UI will be delivered.
Untrue. UI has only improved, and it is hindered being the 'reference wallet' which needs every single feature. Community UI is also underway, that is another more user friendly and stripped to essentials, on the way.
I agree 100%. Finally seeing other versions appearing, but none I like better than ref wallet design thus far, which I am not what I call "in love" with.
My preference would be a UI / UX like Exodus wallet (but with much better security ofc).
Basic transfer, portfolio and some type of shapeshift style of conversion built in, perhaps via atomic swap / HTLC (BSIP44).
If I want to trade (fairly rare for me) I would prefer to use a wallet more dedicated to that purpose. Trading is far more complex an activity that what I outlined above.
There is sooooo much functionality in the ref wallet / BitShares it screams to be split into smaller, easier to manage and maintain, easier to market, more quality for each niche piece.
Please do voice what you see getting worse and worse, and what you suggest to change in the process to help tackle that