Well, if I was intent on debating I would have expanded on my points. I did not, because the purpose of the message was to persuade the poster to stop flagging people unnecessarily.
I think it is very clear that the message was delivered with this purpose, so when you say my point was moot, you clearly didn't even understand the point.
I think you choosing to use the word argument is rather telling too. It seems that is what you are looking for, and I cannot be arsed to provide you with one.
Please enjoy your night, but do so without messaging me if possible.
Joining a voting trail for profit is voluntary, you can voluntarily choose to follow upvotes or downvotes. Comments and posts. People are not forced into this arrangement. It is not abuse.
Your 'argument' that you say you've covered already can be found here...
https://steemit.com/steemit/@ats-david/on-guilds-and-managing-expectations#@son-of-satire/re-ats-david-re-son-of-satire-re-steemship-re-ats-david-on-guilds-and-managing-expectations-20170212t001436090z
I think your reply certainly counts as racist and incredibly offensive - that's abuse.