Well-said.
It’s actually respectable how the team has not chosen to use the “A.I.” term In their marketing, as it really isn’t - at least in the sense most people understand/view it.
There’s an aspect to Tau’s components that could be comparable to or resemble some formthat angle might be a little closer to accurate - though still not completely. of “articifical intelligence” - though whether it was @dana-edwards or someone else who first started using the term “augmented intelligence,”
This really is a challenge to put it all into everyday language, given the innovations are pushing into new territory. It’s semi-helpful to use familiar terms for reference, in order to help people connect some dots to what they already comprehend - though limiting at the same time, for doing so also tends to box the mind into preconceptions and presumptions which fail to keep the receptive to exploring the new, which hasn’t yet been crystallized into definition easily-able to be communicated in old contexts...
I also suspect it’s common to group words like “logic” and “computer” as the same thing, so one wouldnt be in the mind to differentiate it. I haven’t found anyone who’s more precise with their words like Ohad before so I think it’s best not to just glance through his writings, but read into them..
Intelligence amplification (IA). I could describe Tauchain like Memex but for logic.