Sort:  

I gave permission to "Blockchain Collective" to use my work. I am the original write of this article. This is my work and no one else. You are welcome to contact Blockchain Collective if you think that im lying. Here is their email, please contact them:

[email protected]

Robert Lavington

So why does it say that article is by 'danielle'? I am just curious. If you post something on Hive that has been posted elsewhere then you need to be able to prove it is your own work or we have to assume it is plagiarised. The onus is on you to provide the proof. Is this you on Twitter? With so few followers it is not proving much.

A lot of people do an introductory post that can include photograhic or video proof of who is using the account. A link from another site to Hive is further evidence. If someone was pretending to you then you would not want them to be earning from it.

I do not want to drive people away from Hive, but we have to be vigilant about abuse.

Because Danielle asked me to write for her. She has then given my article to "Blockchain Collective". This is all of my own work, i will now never give out my own work to anyone else.

Your choice. If you can provide some proof of who you are and give Hive some original content then there's no reason why you shouldn't do well, but this has hit your reputation score and it will take work to recover that.